I often find myself questioning my own logic so it's no surprise to me that someone else would. However, you put more meaning behind what I say (type) than there is. You overreact to everything. The contents of your 2 (so far) comments prove that so I don't have to. Thanks for making that so easy.
OK, I'm willing to accept that a person who has a whole bunch of consoles would name himself after an admittedly very cool character from a game he has never owned rather than on...
If you own several consoles, but never had one from Sony, why do you name yourself after 2 characters from a game that has only been on Sony systems? I'm going to have to call BS on that.
I'll keep buying Burnout and Command & Conquer games, and Army of Two looks promising, but yeah, EA blows.
Because it affirms your fanboy beliefs. Why else?
This game can be switched to 3rd person, it just doesn't play as well.
I preordered this game over a week ago and they asked me if I wanted the collector's edition.
IBM made cell, not Sony.
If that's what you base how good a game is on, I would imagine you hate Tekken, seeing as there are only 2, count them, 2 characters on screen at once. Kind of silly to use a name from a game you, using your logic, don't like.
If you want to drive a top of the line car, you pay more for insurance. Same with being on the cutting edge of the video game industry.
If you're going to be a next gen gamer, you're going to have to accept the fact that you'll be paying next gen prices for your games. Developers, and to a lesser extent publishers, do in fact need money to make games and they need to turn some kind of profit to motivate them to make more.
If you want cheap games, wait until they're a yea...
I just sent in my 360 for repairs and they specifically told me NOT to send in my HD with it, so I'd like to know where you make up, I mean aquire, your information.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
This is going to be sweet. After watching the TGS Portal and TF2 trailers on Live, I'm almost more excited about them than the actual HL2 game, which no doubt will be pretty wicked.
Except F.E.A.R. apparently. Gears will steal a lot of FEAR's thunder even though it's a great game. Same thing happened to Doom 3 because Half Life 2 came out around the same time and overshadowed it. Damn I'd hate to be the one to go against Gears.
You forgot GRAW and Dead Rising. Both are amazing games. That is FACT, whether or not you agree.
....keep 'em coming.
You should change your name to something more appropriate.
You do understand personal attacks are frowned upon at this site don't you? Oh that's right of course you know because you read that thing you have to agree to in order to post on this site. I figured you'd learn after you popped your first two bubbles. I guess not. Oh well, soon they'll all be gone and we won't have to read your nonsense anymore. I anxiously await that day as if it were Emergence Day.
Games won't be the problem. When I got my 360 on launch day, they still had a stack of each game even though I was the last person to pick up my preordered system. Game discs are easily manufactured in large quantities. Consoles, on the other hand, are much more complex and time consuming to manufacture. Basically what I'm saying is if you are lucky enough to get a PS3 on launch day, you can get any game you want without a problem as long as you have the money to pay for it.
I must suck at Prey because that game took me at least 10 hours to beat.
Alright, now we're talking sense. Fanboyism on either side is complete BS. I just see things a little differently than you is all. I think the Sony fanboys are every bit as bad if not worse than their MS counterparts, but there just aren't as many of them on this forum so they may not seem as bad. Either way, I'd rather not be labeled one of them and talked down on because I raise a fairly logical point. If you are telling the truth, and I see no reason why you wouldn't be, then I'm sorr...